In the end, a lot of people aren't going to make it. 60A: Word that comes from the Greek for "indivisible" (ATOM) — I did not know that. What does it mean when someone calls you bland. I can't find any expert surveys giving the expected result that they all agree this is dumb and definitely 100% environment and we can move on (I'd be very relieved if anybody could find those, or if they could explain why the ones I found were fake studies or fake experts or a biased sample, or explain how I'm misreading them or that they otherwise shouldn't be trusted. Even the phrase "high school dropout" has an aura of personal failure about it, in a way totally absent from "kid who always lost at Little League". Have I ever told you how mysteriously popular this song was on jukeboxes in Edinburgh circa 1989? I'm not claiming to know for sure that this is true, but not even being curious about this seems sort of weird; wanting to ban stuff like Success Academy so nobody can ever study it again doubly so. Sure, cut out the provably-useless three hours a day of homework, but I don't think we've even begun to explore how short and efficient school can be.
The appeal for the left is much harder to sort out. More schools and neighborhoods will have "local boy made good" type people who will donate to them and support them. I'll take that over something ugly and arcane, or a rarely used abbrev., any day. Instead, we need to dismantle meritocracy. The overall distribution of good vs. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue petty. bad students remains unchanged, and is mostly caused by natural talent; some kids are just smarter than others. Mobility, after all, says nothing about the underlying overall conditions of people within the system, only their movement within it. Apparently, Hitler and diabetes *can* be in the puzzle *if* they are being made fun of or their potency is being undermined. DeBoer goes on to recommend universal pre-K and universal after-school childcare for K-12 students, then says:] The social benefits would be profound. Race and gender gaps are stable or decreasing. Some of the book's peripheral theses - that a lot of education science is based on fraud, that US schools are not declining in quality, etc - are also true, fascinating, and worth spreading. Instead, he thinks it just produces another hierarchy - maybe one based on intelligence rather than whatever else, but a hierarchy nonetheless. American education is doing much as it's always done - about as well as possible, given the crushing poverty, single parent-families, violence, and racism holding back the kids it's charged with shepherding to adulthood.
Bullets: - 1A: Ready for publication (EDITED) — This NW area was the only part of the puzzle that gave me any trouble. Why should we want more movement, as opposed to a higher floor for material conditions - and with it, a necessarily lower ceiling, as we take from the top to fund the social programs that establish that floor? Naming a physical trait after an ethnicity—dicey. The others—they're fine. He thinks they're cooking the books by kicking out lower-performing students in a way public schools can't do, leaving them with a student body heavily-selected for intelligence. Treats very unfairly in slang nyt crossword clue grams. DeBoer's answer: by lying. Meritocracy isn't an -ocracy like democracy or autocracy, where people in wigs sit down to frame a constitution and decide how things should work. Anyway, I got this almost instantly, so the clue worked. The only possible justification for this is that it achieves some kind of vital social benefit like eliminating poverty.
School is child prison. Seriously, he talks about how much he hates belief in genetic group-level IQ differences about thirty times per page. If you prefer the former, you're a meritocrat with respect to surgeons. The story of New Orleans makes this impossible. At the time, I noted that meritocracy has nothing to do with this. 114A: Sharpie alternatives (FLAIRS) — Does FLAIR make the fat permanent markers too. Individual people (particularly those who think of themselves as talented) might surely prefer higher social mobility because they want to ascend up the ladder of reward. I can assure you he is not. Programs like Common Core and No Child Left Behind take credit for radically improving American education. So what do I think of them? It's a dubious abstraction over the fact that people prefer to have jobs done well rather than poorly, and use their financial and social clout to make this happen. DeBoer thinks the deification of school-achievement-compatible intelligence as highest good serves their class interest; "equality of opportunity" means we should ignore all other human distinctions in favor of the one that our ruling class happens to excel at.
So higher intelligence leads to more money. We did not make this profound change on the bais of altering test scores or with an eye on graduation rates or college participation. There's no way they're gonna expect me to know a Russian literary magazine (!? They decided to go a 100% charter school route, and it seemed to be very successful. This is sometimes hard, but the basic principle is that I'm far less sure of any of it than I am sure that all human beings are morally equal and deserve to have a good life and get treated with respect regardless of academic achievement. Did you know that when a superintendent experimented with teaching no math at all before Grade 7, by 8th grade those students knew exactly as much math as kids who had learned math their whole lives? Some of the theme answers work quite well.
Oscar Wilde supposedly said George Bernard Shaw "has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends". The schools in New Orleans were transformed into a 100% charter system, and reformers were quick to crow about improved test scores, the only metric for success they recognize. Then I unpacked my adjectives. There is no way school will let you microwave a burrito without permission.
DeBoer not only wants to keep the whole prison-cum-meat-grinder alive and running, even after having proven it has no utility, he also wants to shut the only possible escape my future children will ever get unless I'm rich enough to quit work and care for them full time. 41A: Remove from a talent show, maybe (GONG) — THE talent show... of my youth. Do it before forcing everyone else to participate in it under pain of imprisonment if they refuse! The 1% are the Buffetts and Bezoses of the world; the 20% are the "managerial" class of well-off urban professionals, bureaucrats, creative types, and other mandarins. EXCESSIVE T. RIFFS).
keepcovidfree.net, 2024